[44449] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Tue Nov 27 12:06:17 2001
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:03:11 -0500
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20011127120311.A59562@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0111271855120.22892-100000@meron.openu.ac.il>; from rafi-nanog@meron.openu.ac.il on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:56:40PM +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Rafi Sadowsky wrote:
> Says who ? - maybe you didn't check the right one ?
Perhaps I should restate my complaint a bit. I think all three
of these stand on their own.
* If sub-bits of an allocation are in the ARIN database,
I think the supernet should be in the ARIN database.
* ARIN seems to have a good many, if not all of the .MIL
supernets, but doesn't have this one.
* Having .MIL say they have address space is not proof
that they own the whole block, anymore than www.ufp.org saying
I now own 20 class A's is proof that they are mine.
In any event, I'd just like network lookups to work in some sane
way, so when operators need to check something they can get accurate
results.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
