[44446] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Borchers, Mark)
Tue Nov 27 11:22:33 2001
Message-ID: <CA47B6D616C0D211B92E0008C7C5657C16F5FD35@hscmpxsrvcl01>
From: "Borchers, Mark" <mborchers@splitrock.net>
To: 'Leo Bicknell' <bicknell@ufp.org>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:20:49 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
This is all that shows up at http://www.nic.mil/:
route: 132.0.0.0/10
descr: DISA, DSAC
P. O. Box 1605
Columbus
OH 43216-5002, USA
origin: AS568
member-of: RS-COMM_US_FED
mnt-by: MAINT-AS568
changed: nsfnet-admin@merit.edu 19940819
source: RADB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bicknell@ufp.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:02 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases
>
>
>
>
> 132.0.0.0/10 is floating around:
>
> route-views.oregon-ix.net>show ip bgp 132.0.0.0/10
> BGP routing table entry for 132.0.0.0/10, version 12484641
> Paths: (43 available, best #41)
> Advertised to non peer-group peers:
> 64.166.72.140
> 4513 13646 5696 568, (aggregated by 568 198.26.128.1)
> 195.66.224.82 from 195.66.224.82 (209.10.12.222)
> Origin IGP, metric 7602, localpref 100, valid,
> external, atomic-aggregate
>
> [snip, route-views has more than a page of entries for it]
>
> However, it doesn't apprar to be registered:
>
> % whois -h whois.arin.net 132.0.0.0
> No match for "132.0.0.0".
>
> 568 regisitered to disa.mil, and a number of longer prefixes
> inside the /10 are registered to .mil addresses:
>
> % whois -h whois.arin.net 132.15.0.0
> Kadena Air Base (NET-KADENA-NET)
> Bldg 792, Kadena AB JA
> APO, AP 96368-5149
> US
>
> The question is, do they legitimately own the whole /10? If
> so, why isn't it marked in the databases?
>
> --
> Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
>
