[44336] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Cable & Wireless Maintencance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Golding)
Mon Nov 19 12:50:22 2001
From: "Daniel Golding" <dgolding@sockeye.com>
To: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>,
<jlewis@lewis.org>
Cc: "James A. Farrar" <jim@cw.net>, "nanog" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:49:42 -0500
Message-ID: <GKEFKKIKGCMICPKBAEIMEEFKCEAA.dgolding@sockeye.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0111172259350.3978-100000@www.everquick.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
4006 did - I have no idea what the new owners (Cogent) intend, in that
area. Hopefully they will stick with it. Implimenting a rich community set
like this is a boon to customers, and generally a great learning experience
for the engineers involved. It is also a great troubleshooting tool for NOCs
and engineering departments. Kudos to C&W for this. Efforts such as this,
show that the concept of "transit as a commodity" is really nonsensical.
If anyone is actually interested in how to do impliment something like this,
let me know. If there is enough interest, perhaps a tutorial on this could
be done at the next NANOG.
- Daniel Golding
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> E.B. Dreger
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 6:11 PM
> To: jlewis@lewis.org
> Cc: James A. Farrar; nanog
> Subject: Re: Cable & Wireless Maintencance
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 12:00:23 -0500 (EST)
> > From: jlewis@lewis.org
>
> > This part:
> > http://cw-rr.cw.net/community_prepend.htm
> >
> > is really cool. Do any other backbones support such selective
> > prepending to peers?
>
> AFAIK,
>
> 701: "too complex to implement" (see NANOG archives)
> 1239: claims to (soon will find out for certain)
> 3561: good job!
> 3356: unofficially
> 3549: "plans to", but no definite date
> 4006: yes (comments or URL, Daniel? how is post-Cogent? who is
> the current NetRail/Cogent BGP guru?)
> 6347: definite no, no plans to
>
> I know that I've asked the same question myself many times...
> Phil in CW Europe mentioned that they were planning to do what
> they have now launched, L3 contacted me off-list, UU is public,
> GBLX and SVVS are based on my personal private communications,
> and SPRN is secondhand info.
>
> I, too, would love a comprehensive checklist for the biggest two
> or three dozen ASNs. Anyone else who can comment on other ASNs,
> or add clarity to what I've posted?
>
>
> Eddy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
> Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
> Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
>
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
> From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
> To: blacklist@brics.com
> Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
>
> These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
> send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
>
