[44306] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Congestion peering C&W<->@home
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth M. Kusiak)
Sun Nov 18 19:19:51 2001
Message-ID: <20011119001921.58873.qmail@hex.databits.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10111181902210.1658-100000@nic.gip.net>
From: "Seth M. Kusiak" <seth.kusiak@yours4less.com>
To: German Martinez <gmartine@nic.gip.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:19:21 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Yes, I called CW support on this issue last week and I was told that they
are aware of the issue and that their 2nd and 3rd level techs are on top of
it. They could not give me an ETA but said that the issue has been going on
for 2-3 months.
~Seth
German Martinez writes:
>
> Hi,
> Have somebody notice some congestion between C&W and @home,
>
>>12 acr2-loopback.NewYork.cw.net (206.24.194.62) 153 ms 128 ms 149 ms
>> 13 * cable-and-wireless-peering.NewYork.cw.net (206.24.193.242) 346 ms
>> 349 ms -------> peering congested.
>> 14 c1-pos4-0.cmdnnj1.home.net (24.7.65.229) 353 ms 340 ms *
>
> Is the same congestion all the time, it doesn't matter what time of the
> day.
>
> Any response, off/online will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thank you
> German
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> * THE DILBERT FUTURE *
> * Thriving on Stupidity in the 21st Century *
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Internet capacity will increase indefinitely
> to keep up with the egos of the people using it"
>
