[44287] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Sat Nov 17 16:06:50 2001
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 15:20:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <E1657Ve-000INq-00@rip.psg.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0111171504540.17585-100000@clifden.donelan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Randy Bush wrote:
> > dnsops is for operators of authoritative name servers.
>
> dnsop (note singular) is for non-protocol, but still technical, aspects
> of the dns. i am not aware of an ietf wg which limits parcipitation by
> occupation. if you want cliques, go to icann :-).
Thanks for the correction. I read the DNSOP charter and parts of the
mailing list archive, and had the misconception the work was focused
on authoritative name servers.
> > Is there a white paper, best common practice, or book which shows
> > the naive ISP (whether they have 10 or 10 million subscribers) how
> > to architect their DNS system?
>
> not of which i am aware. wanna help write a dnsop i-d?
Yes. I didn't want to duplicate work. If it doesn't exist, I
can put together at least a few obvious good practices any operator
should consider.
