[44253] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: MPLS in metro access networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Irwin Lazar)
Thu Nov 15 13:11:02 2001
Message-ID: <53BBA8839E91D51194D200902728944E1CF69F@host3.tbg.com>
From: Irwin Lazar <ILazar@tbg.com>
To: 'srihari varada' <varada@txc.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:00:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
MPLS is also useful as a VPN provisioning tool in the Metro space,
especially to allow the provisioning of end-to-end PVCs regardless of Layer
2 transport. For example, a service provider could use MPLS-VPNs to link
sites on its Ethernet MAN to sites on its DSL or Frame Relay services.
Also, you may wish to check out Riverstone's collection of papers on
Etherent, MANs and MPLS available at:
http://www.riverstonenet.com/technology/ and the MPLS Resource Center -
www.mplsrc.com
Irwin
-----Original Message-----
From: srihari varada [mailto:varada@txc.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:12 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: MPLS in metro access networks
Hello:
I have heard some stressing the role of MPLS in metro access networks.
It is difficult for me to visualize the need for it in them while it
is not so difficult to understand the utility (load balancing and fault
restoration etc.) of it in the metro backbone networks.
To characterize metro access networks in the context, the following is
provided:
-- aggregates traffic from residential (arriving via broadband access
links such as xDSL, Cable) and business consumers (arriving via
broadband access links such as
xDSL and high speed links such as Ethernet or SONET)
-- funnels aggregated traffic to metro backbone networks for destination
hosts in the local metro region or remote regions across the
internet regional
and backbone networks. Majority of such access networks are SONET/ATM
based (I didn't come
across any case of Gig Ethernet. However, I do not preculde it).
Thus, there are two questions:
-- Are there known RBOCs/ILECs and CLECs entrenching MPLS in the said
network scope? (I do not see many major ILECs in the un-official MPLS
service
providers list being circulated but it may mean little)
-- If so, what motivates them to do so? Any analysis of the driving
forces is appreciated.
Regards,
Srihari Varada
