[44112] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: IP allocations...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Prior)
Mon Nov 5 22:03:25 2001

Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a05100309b80d014479ff@[210.9.130.234]>
In-Reply-To: <CA47B6D616C0D211B92E0008C7C5657C16F5FBC4@hscmpxsrvcl01>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:28:56 +1030
To: "Borchers, Mark" <mborchers@splitrock.net>,
	Joshua Goodall <joshua@roughtrade.net>, Rich Sena <ras@thick.net>
From: Mark Prior <mrp@mrp.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


At 8:51 AM -0600 5/11/01, Borchers, Mark wrote:
>My understanding of Rich's words "subdelegating internally" would
>be delegations for corporate lans, pop devices, dialup pools, and
>so forth, rather than customer assignments.  Depending on which
>he meant, the two roles are very different.
>
Well in the system I developed we basically used it for all of the 
above since we needed the same sort of information to justify our 
assignments to the APNIC when we came back for more. The system could 
identify an infrastructure request so it could be more lenient with 
respect to requesting second opinions but our customers would have 
been unimpressed if there was one set of rules for them and another 
for us. Of course the internal clients (marketing :-) didn't like it 
when you said no but that's why you have someone further up the chain 
than a low level NOCer making the decisions.

Mark.
-- 

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post