[44031] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 214/8 and 215/8
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean M. Doran)
Thu Nov 1 10:42:37 2001
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-Id: <20011101154201.68816C7914@cesium.clock.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 07:42:01 -0800 (PST)
From: smd@clock.org (Sean M. Doran)
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
| The full RFC2050 justification for a /7's worth of space would
| be a mighty and wondrous thing to behold.
Indeed, and since 2050 predates the allocation date listed
at http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
by a year and a half, I hope such a full justification exists
for what otherwise would be a rather creepy land-grab.
Maybe someone who does FOIAs regularly could start on one,
since nobody seems to have jumped up to justify the two /8s?
Sean. (studiously avoiding the issue of the IANA institutionalization
process underway now, which presumably will have a practical
bearing on such matters...)
