[44022] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 214/8 and 215/8
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chrisy Luke)
Wed Oct 31 22:09:30 2001
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 03:08:32 +0000
From: Chrisy Luke <chrisy@flix.net>
To: Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com>
Cc: "Sean M. Doran" <smd@clock.org>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20011101030832.C29797@flix.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011101113944.00a85f50@localhost>; from pfs@cisco.com on Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 11:44:50AM +1000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Philip Smith wrote (on Nov 01):
> I seem to remember that they were exchanged for 49/8 and 50/8. Seems a bit
> odd that this was done, and I'd love to know what the technical or
> operational or political advantage was. Maybe the IANA folks can shed more
> light?
OT: Perhaps the military hasn't come across the "ip classless" (or
equivalent for other antiquated vendors) directive?
Chris.
--
== chris@easynet.net T: +44 845 333 0122
== Global IP Network Engineering, Easynet Group PLC F: +44 845 333 0122
