[4387] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Top-50 Report

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dean Gaudet)
Sat Sep 14 20:17:45 1996

To: nanog@merit.edu
From: dgaudet@hotwired.com (Dean Gaudet)
Date: 15 Sep 1996 00:15:09 GMT

In article <hot.mailing-lists.nanog-m0v1zka-000NjOC@aero.branch.com>,
Jon Zeeff <jon@branch.com> wrote:
>  ISPs should provide
>good prices on backups connections (ie, connections that almost
>never get any traffic).

And then when they do get traffic they'll be overloaded.  Either
overloaded because the backup provider has no way to budget for your
needs, or because you and a hundred other people are using them for
backup.  Personally I wouldn't trust "backup" lines that I'm not using
regularly.  Who knows if they'll even be working when I need them.

If there were an analysis of the dual-home pairings we might find
that only a handful (say 8) of pairings have significant numbers of
dual-homed customers.  I.e. suppose that MCI/UUNET is the most common
dualhoming pair, then a jointly allocated block could be divided amongst
their dual-homed customers.  Not perfect by far, but something worth
considering.

Dean

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post