[43858] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out--BTW
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Quibell, Marc)
Fri Oct 26 16:20:53 2001
Message-ID: <EF4A9841BCC9D5119E28009027923DF013707C@yosemite.icn.state.ia.us>
From: "Quibell, Marc" <mquibell@icn.state.ia.us>
To: 'James Thomason' <james@divide.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:20:13 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
BTW, I just tried pinging ns01.army.mil...no reply. :(
Marc
-----Original Message-----
From: James Thomason [mailto:james@divide.org]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Patrick W. Gilmore
Cc: nanog@merit.edu; Quibell, Marc
Subject: RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out
If I did, and they responded negatively, I would tell them YOU said it was
a good idea.
Seriously, why should the administrators of *.army.mil care if I test
packet response time between our networks? Is this an illegal activity I
am unaware of?
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
> At 02:16 PM 10/26/2001 -0500, Quibell, Marc wrote:
> >
> >Maybe you should ping NS01.ARMY.MIL about 2400 times in 3 hour and see
if
> >you don't get a visit? Pinging a website 2 times means nothing..
>
> How about 441 times in 2 hours? :)
>
>
> >Marc
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
>
