[43818] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Fwd: Re: Digital Island sponsors DoS attempt

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Oct 26 13:06:10 2001

Message-Id: <200110261655.f9QGtjUg027349@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: Wojtek Zlobicki <wojtekz@idirect.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:44:57 EDT."
             <00cf01c15e3d$8f857a30$020a0a0a@ender> 
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1137647087P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:55:45 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


--==_Exmh_-1137647087P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:44:57 EDT, Wojtek Zlobicki <wojtekz@idirect.com>  said:
> > 3) If someone wget's my web server downloading several hundred megs
> >    and I decide then to send a single ping back, and do a single
> >    DNS lookup, is that wrong?
> Sure is, they have not authorized you to send such traffic.  I've been
> downloading data from your web page, there is no reason for you to send ICMP
> traffic my way (one ICMP packet is one end of the extreme).

ICMP host/net/port unreachable, anybody? How about TCP ECN packets?

--==_Exmh_-1137647087P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iQA/AwUBO9mVkXAt5Vm009ewEQLLegCbBRi8X/MV7WAZE4eIkNKY8iDv0OIAn2zD
sGUvLHJ6L5+XQnn2TQDhWXQH
=q/rm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1137647087P--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post