[43421] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: BGP noise tonight? (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Levine)
Tue Oct 9 14:56:06 2001
From: "Matt Levine" <matt@deliver3.com>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>, "Sean Donelan" <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:55:04 -0700
Message-ID: <BEEPLMELPMPANJHCBHJEMEDLGFAA.matt@deliver3.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <E15r1tf-0000wL-00@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We have found our stick was effective with our vendor, given enough
beatings.
Regards,
Matt
- --
Matt Levine
@Home: matt@deliver3.com
@Work: matt@eldosales.com
ICQ : 17080004
PGP : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0D04CF
"The Trouble with doing anything right the first time is that nobody
appreciates how difficult it was."
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf
Of
Randy Bush
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:47 AM
To: Sean Donelan
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd)
> I agree, it is only one step on a long road. But you have to take
> the first step, if nothing else, so when a "new" vendor releases a
> product it won't include the old behavior. Or at least, an
> officially revised RFC gives customers another stick to beat their
> vendor.
but we have the stick now. unfortunately, we also have a vendor who
ignores sticks. so adding different or more sticks may not be the
way to go.
randy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBO8NHrcp0j1NsDQTPEQJLDwCfQBus6S0ZrGFM77NnpyzbxrmBuHQAoMnx
Fu0t89wOWFNODHlgDo2vi4fA
=Mqmb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
