[43418] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Tue Oct 9 13:17:29 2001

Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20011009123706.H16103@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0110091325120.5740-100000@clifden.donelan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > Should someone think about possibly updating the RFC?
>
> 	you are stuck in the situation that operators are faced in deciding
> what software to run on their network.  if the internet-draft is updated
> you still need vendors to change their behavior and people to upgrade.

I agree, it is only one step on a long road.  But you have to take
the first step, if nothing else, so when a "new" vendor releases a
product it won't include the old behavior.  Or at least, an officially
revised RFC gives customers another stick to beat their vendor.



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post