|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl> Cc: nanog@merit.edu Message-Id: <E15qHNt-00014F-00@roam.psg.com> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 10:06:37 -0700 Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu >> I take it that unless I can point to some specific situation in which some >> specific application or user community is negatively impacted by this, >> you'll go on assuming that this deviant behaviour is merely an exercise in >> creativity. > The way to go about this is to see if breaking existing practice will break > current implementations and plausible future implementations. we call it 'architecture' when we can see it won't work from flaws in the design. we call it a stupid mess when we test a broken design because we lack architectural judgement. randy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |