[43147] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephane Bortzmeyer)
Sun Sep 30 08:20:50 2001
Message-Id: <200109301200.OAA09221@ludwigV.sources.org>
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@gitoyen.net>
To: "Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: <20010928151550.A7675@lightbearer.com>
("Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com>'s message of
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:15:50 MDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 14:00:56 +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Friday 28 September 2001, at 15 h 15,
"Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com> wrote:
> Zebra: OSPF is twitchy, BGP is either great or takes > 1 hour to converge
> a full table,
Never seen that.
> with no clear reason why, and it does not support anything
> but Linux/Intel sanely, yet.
I use Zebra only on Linux/Intel, so it does not bother me. But I know
personnally several people who run it happily on FreeBSD/Intel and the Zebra
mailing list clearly show that most Zebraers seem to prefer *BSD to run it.
