[43101] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: good advice for operators (forwarded, with commentary)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Fri Sep 28 22:05:12 2001

Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010928215736.02bc2ff8@127.0.0.1>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:00:33 -0400
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010929012925.55BC9C7901@cesium.clock.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


At 06:29 PM 9/28/2001 -0700, Sean M. Doran wrote:

 >"announce ... aggregates [, develop a] sensible policy
 >[, and acquire] /20's for each location."

 >| > |     the obvious case of that is when people get a /20 then
 >| > | split the /24's into different geographic regions.  as long as
 >| > | they have a sensible policy, the rir will assign them /20's for
 >| > | each location.

Sean, I really, really think you are missing the point.

How is this of any possible use to companies / providers who do not even 
qualify for a single /20?

--
TTFN,
patrick


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post