|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:36:46 -0600 From: Joel Baker <lucifer@lightbearer.com> To: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net> Cc: nanog@merit.edu Message-ID: <20010928153646.A8768@lightbearer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0109281429500.21306-100000@anime.net>; from goemon@anime.net on Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:31:29PM -0700 Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:31:29PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Joel Baker wrote: > > Zebra: OSPF is twitchy, BGP is either great or takes > 1 hour to converge > > a full table, with no clear reason why, and it does not support anything > > but Linux/Intel sanely, yet. > > Maybe im just lucky but the only problems ive had with zebra so far is > with equal cost multipath. Everything else works great. On Linux/Intel, it works fairly well. On Solaris/Sparc, it does well to compile. At all. Much less run. Much less run stably. -- *************************************************************************** Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com lucifer@lightbearer.com http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |