[43050] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Gorgon's Knot. Was: Re: Verio Peering Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean M. Doran)
Fri Sep 28 17:01:42 2001
To: nanog@merit.edu, patrick@ianai.net, smd@clock.org
Message-Id: <20010928205717.B419AC790A@cesium.clock.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: smd@clock.org (Sean M. Doran)
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I wrote:
> Filter
To clarify and avoid accusations of hypocrisy, I continue to believe
that progressive route-flap dampening is a reasonable alternative,
and results in far fewer "help, i can't get through your network" calls
to your NOC. Perhaps that indicates flap-dampened networks aren't
nearly as often in the process of trying to be used as brand-new
long prefixes?
Sean.
PS http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-210.html
and the network i am involved with does use this
