[43023] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verio Peering Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Parker)
Fri Sep 28 13:07:18 2001
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010928120150.01e4cd08@mailc.starnetinc.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:06:14 -0500
To: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>,
"Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
From: Chris Parker <cparker@starnetusa.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20010928095710.A7249@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 09:57 AM 9/28/2001 -0700, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> If the regional registry's policy is the problem, fix that policy,
>and I think that you'd find Verio's filters would also change. Randy has
>stated on more than one occaision (back when he worked for Verio) that he
>would listen to loose /24's within the proper ranges if the registrys
>would develop a workable microallocation policy.
And just recently seen on the ARIN-ANNOUNCE list:
> Proposal: Establish a micro-assignment policy that would allow
> entities, using multihoming as justification, to obtain
> an assignment from ARIN longer than the current minimum
> assignment size of a /20.
>
>
>This policy proposal discussion will take place on the public policy
>mailing list (ppml@arin.net). Subscription information is available
>at http://www.arin.net/members/mailing.htm
Perhaps this discussion should move to that arena, as it seems that
even Verio will bend their filters to fit the RIR policies.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ Chris Parker - Manager, Development Engineering
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless! \ cparker@starnetusa.net
| @ @ | \ http://www.starnetwx.net \ (847) 963-0116
oOo---(_)---oOo--\------------------------------------------------------
\ Without C we would have 'obol', 'basi', and 'pasal'
