[43009] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Verio Peering Question

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Thu Sep 27 19:38:16 2001

Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010927193302.02e05568@127.0.0.1>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:33:17 -0400
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <E15mkcw-0009Qk-00@roam.psg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


At 04:31 PM 9/27/2001 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
 >> I don't think anyone has ever claimed (Randy included)
 >> that filtering out long prefixes never hurts performance /to
 >> those long prefixes/. Just that the usage of those long
 >> prefixes is small, the effect is often small, and the NET
 >> effect (i.e. on performance to all prefixes) is often improved,
 >> AND the 'public good' effect, in terms of encouraging
 >> CIDR and discouraging disaggregation has benefits for
 >> the global routing table, for everybody, in terms of
 >> reduction of cost (nice statistical demonstration at
 >> last IETF Ptomaine session - please refer to 'belling
 >> the cat' problem).
 >>
 >> Are you going to present statistical data to the contrary?
 >
 ><http://psg.com/~rand/010809.ptomaine.pdf>

Not Found
The requested URL /~rand/010809.ptomaine.pdf was not found on this server.

Sorry. :(


 >randy

--
TTFN,
patrick


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post