[42898] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The wyrms and the law.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Diffey)
Tue Sep 25 15:23:24 2001
Message-ID: <004501c145f6$eabc12b0$6401a8c0@daystarbuilders.com>
From: "Larry Diffey" <ldiffey@technologyforward.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:18:34 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
By that definition, simple armed robbery is terrorism. It would go
something like this:
Robber: Give me your wallet.
Victim: Ok, just don't shoot me, I'll do anything you say. (Reaches slowly
into back pocket) Here you go.
Robber: Lay down on the ground and count to 20 before you get up or I'll
shoot you.
Victim: Whatever you say.
The end result is that the robber coerced the victim into behaving a certain
way. He's going up the river for terrorism if he gets caught.
Larry Diffey
I speak for my employer because I am my employer.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roeland Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: "NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:04 AM
Subject: The wyrms and the law.
>
> Life just got more interesting for the crackers.
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/news/257
>
> Yesterday a new virus was announced on the news. It's only an email virus,
> but in light of the above, the timing is interesting. The bar is being
> raised. Between Code Red and Nimda, the past few months have been most
> interesting, network-wise. By any stretch of the imagination, wyrm
spawning
> falls well within the boundary of "terrorist acts".
>
> The idea is that; to coerce behavior, via threat of harm or direct action
to
> commit harm, is an act of terrorism. There goes the argument that crackers
> are doing us all a favor by exploiting security holes.
>
> --
> R O E L A N D M J M E Y E R
> Managing Director
> Morgan Hill Software Company
> tel: +1 925 373 3954
> cel: +1 925 352 3615
> fax: +1 925 373 9781
> http://www.mhsc.com
>
