[42884] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Zebra users?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Mercer)
Tue Sep 25 08:18:33 2001
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:18:29 -0400
From: Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>
To: mike harrison <meuon@highertech.net>
Cc: "Timothy R. McKee" <trm3@nuvox.net>,
"nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
Message-ID: <20010925081829.A36164@reptiles.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10109250753420.16711-100000@home.highertech.net>; from meuon@highertech.net on Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:02:23AM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:02:23AM -0400, mike harrison wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Timothy R. McKee wrote:
> > A friend has asked me to find out if anyone on Nanog is using Zebra (a gated
> > replacement) and, if so, to ask for their assessment of the program.
>
> I've been using it for a couple of years. If you don't mind playing with
> a bleeding edge with minimal end user support (but lots of heavy duty code
> tuning going on) and some quirks that are quickly being ironed out, it's a
> heck of a good thing.
i'm using it in several places for full, multiple view BGP. 90k+ routes,
multiple peers.
i use it to manage my TorIX connection with some 20+ peers.
the OSPF support is a bit wonky, but it works as well.
--
[ Jim Mercer jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]
