[42750] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: route-map match clause for existance of a BGP session?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Woodfield)
Thu Sep 20 13:33:47 2001
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:33:11 -0400
From: Chris Woodfield <rekoil@semihuman.com>
To: "Bulger, Tim" <TBulger@ea.com>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Message-ID: <20010920133311.C26563@onastick.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FDEDA1BCEEBFD4118FFB00508BB1940B07B13D7E@eahq-mb2>; from TBulger@ea.com on Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:25:14AM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Is there a reason why applying a custom route map to that peering session
only won't work? If you have a "standard" route map, just duplicate it,
rename it, and add the relevant match statement.
-Chris
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:25:14AM -0700, Bulger, Tim wrote:
>
> Sorry for the non-operational content, but looking for some Cisco advice.
>
> Does anyone happen to know a trick for a route map match clause that will
> only match if a BGP session is established with a given peer? The idea
> being to only redistribute a particular static route based on the
> availability of the peer through which the next hop of the static would be
> configured...
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Tim
