[42533] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: What Worked - What Didn't
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Golding)
Mon Sep 17 16:55:37 2001
From: "Daniel Golding" <dgolding@sockeye.com>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:26:18 -0400
Message-ID: <GKEFKKIKGCMICPKBAEIMMEKFCCAA.dgolding@sockeye.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <E15j4mZ-00006N-00@rip.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Feel free to enlighten the masses, but in my previous experience at ISPs
which had reasonable extensive peering, Verio was the only one to require
MD5. The salient point here, is that this is not a widely adopted practice.
If you feel it should be, by all means, make your case, as the internet
community is probably more open to proposals designed to strengthen security
now, than at most other times.
- Daniel Golding
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Daniel Golding
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: What Worked - What Didn't
> Gee, the only major ISP that uses MD5 for peering links is Verio.
i believe that statement to be false
randy
