[42365] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anyone use Cisco Policy Routing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (clarke)
Sat Sep 15 03:23:14 2001
Message-ID: <013701c13db7$219aff00$e2a1fea9@karen>
From: "clarke" <nclarke@mindspring.com>
To: <measl@mfn.org>, "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 03:22:08 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
How does this apply to Cisco's Policy Routing ?
----- Original Message -----
From: <measl@mfn.org>
To: Stephen J. Wilcox <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone use Cisco Policy Routing?
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to setup a platform that will send different types of
packets
> > over different routes, theres a good example of what I'm doing at
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw5_rg.htm
> >
> > under 'Directing Traffic Flows with Policy Routing'
> >
> > Basically, it doesnt work, I'm on IOS 12.0(3) and not sure if its a bug
or
> > just me.
>
> have you tried 12.0(7)? Many fixes to strange issues...
>
> --
> Yours,
> J.A. Terranson
> sysadmin@mfn.org
>
> If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
> should give serious consideration towards setting a better example:
> Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of
> unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in
> the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and
> elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire
> populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate...
> This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States
> as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
>
> The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers,
> associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of
> those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the
> first place...
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
