[42272] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Yes it's off topic but who cares right now.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rowland, Alan D)
Fri Sep 14 15:06:07 2001

Message-ID: <1BEE67ADF602D3119F9A0008C79174C7181FACE8@PETRIFIED>
From: "Rowland, Alan  D" <alan_r1@corp.earthlink.net>
To: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:46:41 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


You're assuming the original act was revenge. Which part of "this is an act
of War" don't you understand? The death toll of this act is projected at
twice the number killed in Pearl Harbor. 

This is a war of survival. I, for one, am not going to go quietly.

-Al

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Greenwell [mailto:patrick@cybernothing.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:11 PM
To: Los, Ralph
Cc: 'Dmitri Krioukov'; 'Arman Khalili'; 'nanog@merit.edu'
Subject: RE: Yes it's off topic but who cares right now. 



On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Los, Ralph wrote:

>
> 	True, there is no taking back what happened, but if GW issued an act
> of war, and did some re-arranging of the middle-east and the like, and
> places like Afganistan, Iraq, and the Palestinian militant states
> DISAPPEARED forever - no one, especially this blue-blooded American would
> shed a tear...and I as one...would see all the psycho-terrorists to hell.

Revenge begets revenge.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post