[42027] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Thu Sep 13 04:06:29 2001

Reply-To: <deepak@ai.net>
From: "Deepak Jain" <deepak@ai.net>
To: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com>,
	<nanog@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
Cc: <doshea@telentente.com>, <toasty@temphost.dragondata.com>,
	<DaveHowe@gmx.co.uk>, <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 04:05:53 -0400
Message-ID: <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDIKENOFIAA.deepak@ai.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <F391enAqpfkNsjUHQHh00017068@hotmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



That's what the National Guard and FBI are for. FBI has plenty of scary
military-types
to do exactly the same function as a military-scary-type.

Deepak

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
Ron Buchalski
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:35 AM
To: deepak@ai.net; nanog@Overkill.EnterZone.Net
Cc: doshea@telentente.com; toasty@temphost.dragondata.com;
DaveHowe@gmx.co.uk; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof



During an interview this evening on NBC, Tom Brokaw asked Donald Rumsfeld
(Sec. of Defense) whether the US Military would be willing to provide
security personnel on commercial jets.  He responded that US Military
personnel are trained for war, not to be security or police, and would not
be deployed as security for commercial airlines.


-rb

>From: "Deepak Jain" <deepak@ai.net>
>Subject: RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
>Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:53:14 -0400
>
>
>
>I'm inclined to agree. Especially if the Marine is specifically trained for
>air-terrorism scenarios, but I can't imagine that is the solution we as a
>country will adopt.
>
>Deepak


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post