[42003] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Lack of Security
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mathias Körber)
Thu Sep 13 01:00:10 2001
From: "Mathias Körber" <mathias@koerber.org>
To: "Daren French" <dfrench@axcelerant.com>,
"Dave Stewart" <dbs@ntrnet.net>, <nanog@merit.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:22:41 +0800
Message-ID: <NFBBLGLCMLMKAABDCGFOKECKCAAA.mathias@koerber.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <4EBB5C35607E7F48B4AE162D956666EF34C93A@guam.corp.axcelerant.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
| What if we were to increase the security of the pilots (basically the
| cabin door) and then place some type of secure "sleeping gas" in the
| cabin that could be triggered by the pilots? Now, I know this sounds
| like something out of a James Bond movie, but in our short discussion,
| we could not think of a downside. Comments?
1. Medical problems some passengers may have with the gas? While it
might be a reasonable tradeoff to lose a passenger or two if the
whole plane (and whatever it may hit) can be saved, making that =
determination
that early (at the first sign of an hijack attempt) would likely be
impossible.
2. Gas masks
