[4200] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The SWAMP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no)
Mon Sep 9 07:27:54 1996
To: gih@aarnet.edu.au
Cc: randy@PSG.COM, freedman@netaxs.com, nanog@merit.edu,
namedroppers@internic.net
From: Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 9 Sep 1996 20:46:25 +1000 (EST)"
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 1996 13:26:53 +0200
> Isn't the argument of the non-default routing tables growing by an
> additional 13 entries or not is specious noise? The routing bucket is
> leaking through bloody great open chasms and we are wondering about
> the incremental damage throuigh a pinhole!
The 13 additional entries are not the issue. The issue is one of
setting a bad high-profile example.
Any suggestions for closing the open chasms in the routing
bucket?
- Havard
