[41915] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hire, Ejay)
Wed Sep 12 19:06:50 2001
Message-ID: <F5F3FBBFC94DD4118E4500D0B74A095F013E70E9@EMAIL2>
From: "Hire, Ejay" <Ejay.Hire@Broadslate.net>
To: 'John Hall' <j.hall@f5.com>, Vadim Antonov <avg@exigengroup.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:37:27 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
That's great unless the pilot needs to check something in the plane. (I was
sitting in first class once when they popped the carpet to check and make
sure the landing gear was all the way down. Very unsettling.)
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hall [mailto:j.hall@f5.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:07 PM
To: Vadim Antonov
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
Bullet proof bulkhead separating the pilot's compartment from the cabin
that is locked/unlocked externally by the ground crew. Everyone knows
the pilot *can't* open the door even if he wanted to...
JMH
Vadim Antonov wrote:
>
> Locked bulletproof door to the cockpit. Survelliance cameras in the
> passenger compartments. That all which was needed to foil the attack. Now
> I think it's time to ask why this isn't the standard procedure?
>
> --vadim
