| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 96 22:13 PDT From: randy@psg.com (Randy Bush) To: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com> Cc: nanog@merit.edu, namedroppers <namedroppers@internic.net> >> We have considered assigning a /32 to each root name server and asking >> everybody in the universe to carry these 10 or so routes in the interest >> of complete and permanent provider independence. So rather than worry >> about the /24's ... :-) > > If there has to be a separate route for each one anyway, why not just > blow 253*10 addresses and announce a /24 for each root name server, even > if only one IP out of each /24 is used? > > Less CPU to blow holes in filters that normally deny> /24. I agree with your ammendment to the proposal. It makes it somewhat more sensible. But I gotta ask why we have to pollute the world with a few more /24s. Everybody who has introduced /24s probably thinks that their reason is justified. Commons, meet sheep. randy
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |