[41784] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Analysis from a JHU CS Prof
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Dixon)
Wed Sep 12 05:05:12 2001
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:01:25 +0100 (BST)
From: Jim Dixon <jdd@vbc.net>
To: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: "'Dan Hollis'" <goemon@anime.net>,
Vadim Antonov <avg@exigengroup.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <EA9368A5B1010140ADBF534E4D32C728069EA2@condor.mhsc.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10109121000380.11465-100000@matthew.uk1.vbc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> |> Or they could just fly plainclothes armed marshals on US flights.
> |>
> |> Apparently they tried this years ago, but stopped because it was
> |> "uneconomical". I guess the airlines have figured out how to
> |> put a dollar
> |> amount on human lives.
>
> excuse me, but I don't think that the airlines were paying for those
> marshals. Please look towards uncle sugar, for that gaff.
The US government paid for the marshals' airplane tickets?
--
Jim Dixon VBCnet GB Ltd http://www.vbc.net
tel +44 117 929 1316 fax +44 117 927 2015