[41513] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Neals)
Tue Sep 11 11:30:44 2001
Message-ID: <D5F0BE7E951B7645A01B9305761709DD94154B@yyzxch07.gt.ca>
From: Randy Neals <rneals@gt.ca>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 10:32:58 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Traffic patterns on our network are starting to look different than normal.
I expected more traffic but it seems that traffic volumes are decreasing
slightly.
What are others seeing?
-Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: deeann mikula [mailto:deeann@telerama.com]
Sent: September 11, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Charles Sprickman
Cc: Avi Freedman; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Avi Freedman wrote:
>
> > FYI, 2 planes crashed into the world trade center.
> > Sounds like on purpose.
>
> > Not to be ghoulish, but the traffic impact is looking to be fairly large
> > on the 'net (and on the PSTN in the NYC area).
few people (in pgh, PA) that i have been talking to on irc have
reported ./'d news sites everywhere. (cnn.com, yahoo.com, msnbc.com,
etc.) my office has been relegated am radio, which is pretty pathetic
for an ISP.
pretty poor performance for a network orginally designed to faciliate
communication in just such circumstances. i hope that military and
federal communication is faring better than the commercial sites.
> All VHF TV stations except for CBS 2 are off the air, many radio stations
> are off the air, and it's largely impossible to get a call in. All
i assume that in nyc or dc only. we are listening to AM radio just
fine...
deeann m.m. mikula
director of operations
telerama public access internet
http://www.telerama.com
1.877.688.3200
