[41470] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Sep 10 16:29:13 2001
Message-Id: <200109102028.f8AKSAr06548@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net>, NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:46:48 BST."
<1722988539.1000154808@[169.254.198.40]>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1139440502P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:28:10 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-1139440502P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:46:48 BST, Alex Bligh said:
> Oh so true, and of far wider applicability than the subject at
> hand. If this mailing list had a FAQ, this should be the answer
> to most of the questions.
Q1: What are the common flame wars on NANOG?
A1: RFC1918, ORBS/MAPS, ARIN, PI /28s, DSL for business use.
Q2: What are some proper ways to configure/run a network? For instance,
should I use RFC1910 space to number my routers?
A2: See Q1.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_-1139440502P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/09/2001
iQA/AwUBO50iWnAt5Vm009ewEQJjBgCg47BFq12b+VeBkE3bPe1SrjwPcYoAoPRl
YRUSNBBltschBY9hown/hwgH
=5yvV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1139440502P--
