[41436] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sun Sep 9 19:21:34 2001
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Brian Whalen <bri@sonicboom.org>
Cc: Bob K <melange@yip.org>, "NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu>
Message-Id: <E15gDrg-000BRg-00@rip.psg.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 16:19:48 -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Not exactly, in your scenario you are counting on the firewall to block
> hostile traffic destined for some ips. If they are Natted, it is more
> work to compromise those stations.
and if you change your name you are less likely to be mugged.
randy
