[41407] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Batchelor)
Fri Sep 7 20:49:35 2001
From: "Mike Batchelor" <mikebat@tmcs.net>
To: "Andy Dills" <andy@xecu.net>, "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell@ufp.org>
Cc: "NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:47:56 -0700
Message-ID: <LLEOLJEDPHOFANPCPKOMIEHICEAA.mikebat@tmcs.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.32.0109071930400.2624-100000@shell.xecu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> For that matter, what ISP NATs you against your will?
Every ISP that utilizes a transparent caching HTTP proxy.
NEXT!
> Andy
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBO5lqu0ksS4VV8BvHEQKx1wCfcRZtKto0PYyvnQmSTDSK8Hr8CBoAoIm0
YABQSZTS2/lIH/GG3ZqE6SHJ
=t14y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
