[41384] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re[3]: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Welty)
Fri Sep 7 15:18:54 2001
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:17:59 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: INLINE
In-Reply-To: <a05100325b7bec885413a@[10.200.186.50]>
Message-Id: <E15fR72-0005rd-00@krusty-motorsports.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:56:31 -0700 Jon Mansey <jon_mansey@verestar.com> wrote:
>
> I seem to be able to connect to port-forwarded services behind my
> office NAT firewall just fine from my laptop behind my home NAT box.
> Whats the problem?
when you try and use an IPSec client to connect through a NAT box to a
corporate IPSec appliance, you'll see a problem (unless the client and box
are using an agreed upon proprietary solution, which some do.)
richard
--
Richard Welty Averill Park Networking
rwelty@averillpark.net 518-573-7592
