[41346] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Richards)
Thu Sep 6 21:33:46 2001
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:31:17 -0700
From: Josh Richards <jrichard@cubicle.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010906183117.A14744@cubicle.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EA9368A5B1010140ADBF534E4D32C728069E7A@condor.mhsc.com>; from rmeyer@mhsc.com on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 06:18:52PM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
* Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com> [20010906 18:16]:
> if you are doing one:one NAT then why do NAT at all?
To ease a renumbering transition.
I'll keep out of the rest of the thread..
-jr
----
Josh Richards <jrichard@{ geekresearch.com, cubicle.net }> [JTR38/JR539-ARIN]
Geek Research, LLC - San Luis Obispo, CA - <URL:http://www.geekresearch.com/>
KG6CYK - IP/Unix/telecom/knowledge/coffee/security/crypto/business/geek
