[41257] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Upsurge in attacks?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Tue Sep 4 19:33:48 2001
Reply-To: <deepak@ai.net>
From: "Deepak Jain" <deepak@ai.net>
To: "Paul Walmsley" <shag@booyaka.com>,
"mike harrison" <meuon@highertech.net>
Cc: "Nanog@Merit. Edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:36:48 -0400
Message-ID: <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDIMEJLFFAA.deepak@ai.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109041818300.19389-100000@utopia.booyaka.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I wanted to reroute forged traffic through an RFC2549 network. Budget
considerations kept us from training a sufficient number of "network"
handlers, though.
DJ
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
Paul Walmsley
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 7:19 PM
To: mike harrison
Cc: Nanog@Merit. Edu
Subject: Re: Upsurge in attacks?
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, mike harrison wrote:
>
> > Has anyone else noticed an upsurge in unsophisticated [packet flood,
etc]
> > attacks since college kids have to their own devices in dorms again this
> > year?
>
> The IP-Spoofing scan floods have been unreal..from my own customers.
have you considered RFC 2827?
- Paul
