[41231] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: multi-homing fixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Bligh)
Sun Sep 2 11:25:41 2001
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 16:25:06 +0100
From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Reply-To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Cc: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Message-ID: <1019400935.999447906@[169.254.198.40]>
In-Reply-To: <g366b1hbbh.fsf@as.vix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Paul,
--On Sunday, 02 September, 2001 8:17 AM -0700 Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
wrote:
> using UDP
> performance into a predictor of TCP performance. Not only ain't it
> nec'ily so [1], it is nec'ily not so [2].
Understand [1] well, but not [2]. Care to elaborate?
I'd have thought there were trivial counterexamples (i.e. when
it 'is so'), f'rinstance when one path has both huge delay and
large packet loss.
--
Alex Bligh
Personal Capacity
