[41226] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: multi-homing fixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin, Christian)
Sat Sep 1 14:03:53 2001
Message-ID: <94B9091E1149D411A45C00508BACEB359CDDE4@entmail.gnilink.com>
From: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
To: 'Iljitsch van Beijnum' <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 14:02:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> but this is not really necessary either, if you use an IGP. (But some
> networks use iBGP rather than an IGP to carry customer routes
> internally.)
I think it is more than 'some.' Carrying anything in your IGP aside from
the links that make up the network and the nodes themselves presents several
scaling issues, IMHO.
--chris
>
