[41099] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What is the limit? (was RE: multi-homing fixes)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Wed Aug 29 15:20:48 2001
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:20:16 -0400
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: North America Network Operators Group Mailing List <nanog@merit.edu>
Message-ID: <20010829152016.B30560@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ussenterprise.ufp.org>,
North America Network Operators Group Mailing List <nanog@merit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010829190236.4BA71E8@proven.weird.com>; from woods@weird.com on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:02:36PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:02:36PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> Take a look inside a Juniper router -- you should be pleasantly
> surprised by the very standard CompacPCI processor board you'll find
> inside of it that, among a few other things, does the route
> processing.... and it's running mostly stock FreeBSD no less.... even
> with a root prompt you can get at!
Since several people have brought it up, I work with Junipers on
a daily basis. They have done some good things, and seem to have
an upper hand in routing performance when compared to Cisco's.
That said, I don't think they are immune to my complaints, and in
fact since they are using a lot of standard parts you'd think they
might be doing lots more than they are...
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org
Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org