[41074] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What is the limit? (was RE: multi-homing fixes)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Wed Aug 29 11:39:12 2001
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:36:31 -0400
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: "Sean M. Doran" <smd@clock.org>
Cc: bicknell@ufp.org, leigh@aurora.uk.insnet.net,
cmartin@gnilink.net, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010829113631.B15631@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ussenterprise.ufp.org>,
"Sean M. Doran" <smd@clock.org>, bicknell@ufp.org,
leigh@aurora.uk.insnet.net, cmartin@gnilink.net, nanog@merit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010829153016.B907BC790C@cesium.clock.org>; from smd@clock.org on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:30:16AM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:30:16AM -0700, Sean M. Doran wrote:
> "current" being the key word here. It's not exponential today. (pace hcb)
So we don't have a problem, Sean. Moores law is. If, as you state
routing table growth isn't the problem is solved. We just wait for
faster processors.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org
Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
