[41019] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: multi-homing fixed

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rachel Warren)
Tue Aug 28 13:05:27 2001

Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:01:48 -0700
From: Rachel Warren <rachel@plur.net>
To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ussenterprise.ufp.org>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010828100148.C4690@terra.plur.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010828124226.A41751@ussenterprise.ufp.org>; from bicknell@ufp.org on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 12:42:26PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> > The suitcase nuclear bomb that takes out my facility in one location
> > is very likely to take out my other facility in the same metro area.
> > And probably all the customers who would remotely care.
> 
> I don't know about the others in this thread, but the suitcase
> nuclear bomb is well outside the types of things I worry about
> protecting against, and in fact were one to explode I think 'lack
> of internet access' would be _WAY_ down on my list of priorities.

Hopefully Sean was being a bit over the top. :)

A bomb threat is definately something to worry about, though.  I wish I 
remembered more of the details or a news article to substantiate, but what 
I do remember about a year ago was a bomb threat at the non-ghetto MAE-EAST 
facility in Vienna, VA (I remember we were all wondering why all the WCOM 
people were leaving the building).

If a bomb (threat) actually had occured, things would have definately
been unhappy.

Rachel

-- 
But it is a characteristic of wisdom not to do desperate things. - Thoreau

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post