[40997] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: multi-homing fixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Rhett)
Tue Aug 28 10:40:10 2001
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:37:45 -0700
From: Joe Rhett <jrhett@isite.net>
To: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: "'David Schwartz'" <davids@webmaster.com>,
Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>,
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010828073745.F17006@isite.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>,
'David Schwartz' <davids@webmaster.com>,
Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>,
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EA9368A5B1010140ADBF534E4D32C728069E42@condor.mhsc.com>; from rmeyer@mhsc.com on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:57:29PM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
To go supremely offtopic..
> BTW, randy's position is rather strange, coming from someone that used to
> support the FidoNet community, by being the FTSC chair.
When running a FidoNet node you can select what you take and not. Nobody
could demand that you take X or Y although they could strike up agreements
with others to route around you.
In essense, what has changed?
--
Joe Rhett Chief Geek
JRhett@ISite.Net ISite Services, Inc.
