[40963] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: multi-homing fixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Tue Aug 28 00:59:05 2001
Message-ID: <EA9368A5B1010140ADBF534E4D32C728069E43@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>,
Mark Radabaugh - Amplex <mark@amplex.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:59:32 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
|> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
|> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:00 PM
|> > The only reason we multihomed to 2xT1 rather than adding additional
|> > capacity with our first provider lack of clue.
|>
|> so the world should pay because you won't choose a
|> reliable/reasonable
|> provider?
|>
|> > How do you propose that a small ISP grow large enough to
|> afford a 2xDS3
|>
|> an isp usually has a /20-/21, yes?
|>
|> we're talking about MICRO allocations.
Maybe. But, I've always considered MICRO to be less than /24.
