[40869] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: multi-homing fixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Whalen)
Fri Aug 24 00:31:56 2001
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Whalen <bri@sonicboom.org>
To: John Fraizer <nanog@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
Cc: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108232347550.9263-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
Message-ID: <20010823213105.F16096-100000@cx175057-a.ocnsd1.sdca.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Yes and this non cisco ram can make Cisco's tac have a cor or two..
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, John Fraizer wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:23:24PM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> > > At $99US for 512MB of PC133 RAM (the point is, RAM is disgustingly cheap and
> > > getting cheaper), more RAM in the routers is a quick answer. Router clusters
> >
> > You almost make some good arguments. I pick up on this one for
> > two reasons:
> >
> > 1) You clearly haven't priced Cisco RAM lately. :-)
>
> Having the "Cisco" name on it and it working in Cisco equipment is a
> different story. Altough, we found out the hard way that RSP4 memory does
> NOT work in an RSP8. It'll boot on it but DON'T try to make it do
> anything after-the-fact.
>
> That said, you can get RAM for "cisco" products at many multiples less
> than Cisco wants to charge for it.
>
> ---
> John Fraizer
> EnterZone, Inc
>
>
