[40867] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: multi-homing fixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vijay Gill)
Thu Aug 23 22:08:07 2001
To: "Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Vijay Gill <vgill@vijaygill.com>
Date: 24 Aug 2001 02:07:35 +0000
In-Reply-To: "Joel Baker"'s message of "Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:59:31 -0600"
Message-ID: <7m8zgaxlaw.fsf@challah.msrl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
"Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com> writes:
> Or by SCTP - an elegant, protocol-level solution to most of the basic
> reasons for small businesses (IE, those not likely to qualify for a
> provider-independant block) to want multihoming.
>
> Unfortunately, it appears to be even more poorly adopted than IPv6 so far,
The fatal sentence.
To forestall ratholing on this list, I urge people to take this to the
rathole-by-charter: multi6
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/multi6-charter.html
/vijay "bring the noise" gill
