[40859] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: XTNS launch alternate domain name system

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (doug@safeport.com)
Thu Aug 23 18:46:48 2001

Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 18:45:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: <doug@safeport.com>
To: Mike Batchelor <mikebat@tmcs.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <LLEOLJEDPHOFANPCPKOMAEFBCEAA.mikebat@tmcs.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108231839570.28945-100000@pemaquid.safeport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


They were a small government contracting company (belt-way bandit for those in
the Washington DC area) with contracts having to do with the running of IBM MVS
data centers. The NSF contract was "won" like any other. I am sure there are
reading of this list that could supply more (ancient) history.

On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Mike Batchelor wrote:

> | Signature by unknown keyid: 0x55F01BC7
> 
> > It never ceases to amaze me that people will create business models around
> > selling products that should be worth nothing...
> >
> > joelja
> 
> You mean companies like Network Solutions, nee Verisign?  What did NSI do
> before they got the NSF contract way back when?  Did they actually have a
> line of business that did not rely on the registry, at some point in the
> distant past (prior to the Chixulub impact)?  Or was the company formed just
> to service and exploit the NSF contract?
> 
> ---
> Computers hate being anthropomorphized.
> 

_____
Douglas Denault
doug@safeport.com
Voice: 301-469-8766
  Fax: 301-469-0601


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post